Marta Wróblewska: From centre to (semi)periphery: policy-making in the area of research impact evaluation in UK, Poland and Norway
Episode von RMZ Science Works von Robert K. Merton Zentrum für Wissenschaftsforschung · 8. Januar 2025 · 37 min
The talk will offer a comparative review of policy-making in the area of research impact evaluation in UK (REF), Poland (EJDD) and Norway (Humeval and Sameval). Poland and Norway have used an ex-post, expert-review system modeled on the British REF. There are several analogies between the studied impact evaluation systems, including similar definitions of impact, the use of case studies as the basis for evaluation, the structuring of the impact template and English as the language of evaluation. There are also several differences: the mode of introduction of the exercise (gradual vs. shift), whether the exercise is tied to funding, and the level of transparency of the policy-making and evaluation process. The text will present an overview of the three approaches on impact evaluation and attempt to answer the following question: 1) How does the articulation of research impact change depending on the goals of the exercise and the broader academic and social context into which the exercise is introduced; 2) Consequently, how do the effects of the exercise differ from one national context to another?
After longer comparative part of the talk (based on an article submitted for review to Research Evaluation), I will attempt an interpretation of the ongoing process of policy-borrowing in the area of impact evaluation in terms of centre-periphery dynamics (as described by Immanuel Wallerstein) and/or Antonio Gramsci's theory of hegemony. The goal of the talk will be to test out theoretical theoretical perspectives on the data collected. I welcome any remarks and recommendations from the audience.
Weitere Episoden von „RMZ Science Works“
- Cornelia Schendzielorz /Justo Serrano-Zamora /Staffan Edling: Science under pressure: Engaging with science and democracy in hybrid sites 22. Juli 2026
- Claudia Göbel: A fresh look at science-public relations, their problems, and digital transformations 24. Juni 2026
- Susanne Wollin-Giering & Markus Hoffmann: Epistemic factors affecting the (dis)continuation of research with missing resources 10. Juni 2026
- Yoanna Yankova/Jens Ambrasat: Promotion into the worse? Gendered culture in academia 27. Mai 2026
- Ayat Mirzaie/Masoumeh Qarakhani: Scientific professionalism under constraint: Associations, expertise boundaries, and external pressure 13. Mai 2026
- Dieter Plehwe: Science and think tanks: A complicated relationship 29. April 2026
- Catherine Herfeld: Model Transfer and its Role in Awakening Sleeping Beauties in Science 15. April 2026
- Veit Braun: Memories Are Made of This: Materielle Erinnerung in Biobanken 4. März 2026
- Paula Muhr: Limits to the Circulation of Epistemic Critique in the Recent Reanalyses of the EHT Images of the M87* Black Hole 18. Februar 2026
- Willem Halffman/Serge Horbach: The library and the database: two imaginaries for the research literature 4. Februar 2026
- Sebastian Büttner: In der Wissenskrise? Politisierung von Wissen und Expertise als Herausforderung für die Soziologie 21. Januar 2026
- Sheena F. Bartscherer/Sven Ulpts/Bart Penders/Sarahanne Field: The (anti)social replication of replication: exploring how replication moves across epistemic communities 7. Januar 2026
- Marco Seeber: The evolution of the scientific publishing market, its drivers and implications 10. Dezember 2025
- Chérifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri & Jie Xu: The big transformation? Early Career Researchers as they race in the open scholarly world. Perspectives from France and China 26. November 2025
- Jesper W. Schneider: Questionable Research Practices, what are they and so should we worry? 12. November 2025
Alle Episoden von RMZ Science Works · Mehr Wissenschaft-Podcasts