Susanne Wollin-Giering & Markus Hoffmann: Epistemic factors affecting the (dis)continuation of research with missing resources
Episode von RMZ Science Works von Robert K. Merton Zentrum für Wissenschaftsforschung · 10. Juni 2026 · 47 min
This talk discusses the possibilities of researchers to continue their work in situations where access to previously held resources is constrained. We start from the assumption that academic researchers rely on specific resources to be able to work. While many of these resources are usually provided by research organizations like universities, scientific communities remain the primary reference point for the work of researchers. The result is that some resources need to be acquired from elsewhere and that research can in some cases be continued without organizational support. The resulting situation is undertheorized by both organization and work studies (because they treat the full provision of resources for employees as a given and the content of work as unproblematic) and science studies (because of their focus on funding as the primary type of resource). We propose to fill this gap by treating the provision of resources as a variable on the one hand and by establishing a link between conditions of research, planned and conducted research processes, and necessary adaptions of researchers to changes in their conditions on the other hand.
We present results from interviews in projects investigating two situations where previously secured access to resources becomes constrained: the unemployment of researchers and the COVID-19 pandemic. The two situations can be compared through conceptualizing their effect on researchers as a change of access in resources. We focus on a comparison of two fields, plant biology and ethnology, to show how different career stages, the timing of research processes, and field-specificity impact the possibilities of researchers to continue working during these situations.
Weitere Episoden von „RMZ Science Works“
- Cornelia Schendzielorz /Justo Serrano-Zamora /Staffan Edling: Science under pressure: Engaging with science and democracy in hybrid sites 22. Juli 2026
- Claudia Göbel: A fresh look at science-public relations, their problems, and digital transformations 24. Juni 2026
- Yoanna Yankova/Jens Ambrasat: Promotion into the worse? Gendered culture in academia 27. Mai 2026
- Ayat Mirzaie/Masoumeh Qarakhani: Scientific professionalism under constraint: Associations, expertise boundaries, and external pressure 13. Mai 2026
- Dieter Plehwe: Science and think tanks: A complicated relationship 29. April 2026
- Catherine Herfeld: Model Transfer and its Role in Awakening Sleeping Beauties in Science 15. April 2026
- Veit Braun: Memories Are Made of This: Materielle Erinnerung in Biobanken 4. März 2026
- Paula Muhr: Limits to the Circulation of Epistemic Critique in the Recent Reanalyses of the EHT Images of the M87* Black Hole 18. Februar 2026
- Willem Halffman/Serge Horbach: The library and the database: two imaginaries for the research literature 4. Februar 2026
- Sebastian Büttner: In der Wissenskrise? Politisierung von Wissen und Expertise als Herausforderung für die Soziologie 21. Januar 2026
- Sheena F. Bartscherer/Sven Ulpts/Bart Penders/Sarahanne Field: The (anti)social replication of replication: exploring how replication moves across epistemic communities 7. Januar 2026
- Marco Seeber: The evolution of the scientific publishing market, its drivers and implications 10. Dezember 2025
- Chérifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri & Jie Xu: The big transformation? Early Career Researchers as they race in the open scholarly world. Perspectives from France and China 26. November 2025
- Jesper W. Schneider: Questionable Research Practices, what are they and so should we worry? 12. November 2025
- Christian Greiffenhagen: Judging importance before checking correctness: quick opinions in mathematical peer review 29. Oktober 2025
Alle Episoden von RMZ Science Works · Mehr Wissenschaft-Podcasts