#225 | OPC UA vs. MQTT – Getting data out of 100+ machines | Prosys OPC
Episode von IoT Use Case Podcast von Ing. Madeleine Mickeleit ("Mrs. IoT") · 14. Oktober 2026 · 49 min
#ITOTIntegration #OPCUA #MQTT
In episode #225 of the IoT Use Case Podcast, Ing. Madeleine Mickeleit talks to Pyry Grönholm, CEO of Prosys OPC. Using a plant in Finland with more than 100 machines as an example, they discuss how to get data out of a machine park built up over the years – and when OPC UA or MQTT is the right choice.
Summary
The plant is part of an international manufacturing group, with machines from many vendors and generations. The trigger was an MES project due in about two years. Prosys first replaced the outdated OEE system and built status dashboards. Machines were connected wherever possible: via OPC UA servers, Siemens, Beckhoff and EtherNet/IP connectors, Modbus through existing gateways, or an additional PLC next to the old one. The team initially expected 30 to 50% of the machines – according to Pyry, it was significantly more.
The data is harmonized in open OPC UA information models for status, OEE and MES, identical across all machines. The customer owns the model, not the software vendor. A newly connected machine is live in under an hour.
Then the question many in the community ask: OPC UA or MQTT – which wins for industrial data? Pyry has a clear answer, explains it with an everyday analogy and links it to a project detail: The original plan is not what was implemented in the end.
Key takeaways
One information model per machine type is enough; after that, each new machine is just a template plus mapping.
Gateways a legacy system already wired to unconnected PLCs can still be used via Modbus.
If automation engineers model each variable's unit, value range and meaning, data engineers and AI understand the data.
In large corporations, find out early how IT provisioning and permissions work – or lose a lot of time waiting.
-----
Relevante Folgenlinks:
Madeleine (https://www.linkedin.com/in/madeleine-mickeleit/)
Pyry (https://www.linkedin.com/in/pyrygronholm/)
Join the user group (https://www.iotusecase.com/en/user-group)
Weitere Episoden von „IoT Use Case Podcast“
- #224 | Datenharmonisierung mit AIoT: Was brauchen KI-Agenten für das Mapping? 23. September 2026
- Podcast-Update: Neues Format + neuer Rhythmus 9. September 2026
- #223 | IO-Link zu MQTT: Sensordaten anbinden ohne Eingriff in die Steuerung 2. September 2026
- #222 | Cyber Resilience Act for OEMs: From Compliance Evidence to a Lifecycle Service | Cumulocity 26. August 2026
- #221 | 23 Folgen zusammengefasst: Was wirklich funktioniert hat und was nicht 12. August 2026
- #220 | Datenfundament für die KI-getriebene Produktion im Mittelstand 5. August 2026
- #219 | Make or Buy im IIoT: Use Cases skalieren mit einer LoRaWAN-Plattform | akenza.io 22. Juli 2026
- #218 | Verwaltungsschale in der Modellfabrik: Produktionslinien flexibel rekonfigurieren | XITASO 15. Juli 2026
- #213 | Direct Air Capture: Der Weg vom Pilot zur autonomen Industrieanlage | ifm & Greenlyte 13. Mai 2026
- #209 | Hochwasser früher erkennen mit Radar und NB-IoT | Endress+Hauser 25. März 2026
- #174 | KUNBUS & Wendeware: Energiemanagement per IIoT skalieren | KUNBUS & Wendeware 25. Juni 2025
- #162 | Digitale Wartung leicht gemacht – So funktioniert der Self-Service im MyUNTHA Portal | UNTHA shredding technology 2. April 2025
- #148 | OPC UA-Integration von 70 Regenwasser-Pumpstationen und IT/OT-Sicherheit | Red Lion 6. November 2024
- #146 | CLAAS: Digitale Landwirtschaft mit sicheren Maschinen-Identitäten | CLAAS & secunet 23. Oktober 2024
- #135 | Risikomanagement: IT-Sicherheit am Beispiel Krankenhaus | A1 Digital & Asimily 26. Juni 2024
Alle Episoden von IoT Use Case Podcast · Mehr Technologie-Podcasts